About

Peptide reviews with a spine.

Why this site exists and how we decide what to publish.

The Peptide Vault started with a simple frustration: almost every "peptide vendor review" online is either a thinly disguised advertisement or a five-year-old forum thread that no longer reflects reality. If you're peptide-curious and trying to figure out who to trust, you're mostly on your own.

We wanted the resource we couldn't find — one that treats you like an adult who can handle the truth, including the uncomfortable parts.

How we review

Our reviews are built on a few non-negotiables:

• Documentation over marketing. A vendor's Certificate of Analysis (CoA) — ideally third-party, batch-specific, with HPLC purity data — tells us more than any homepage promise. When we can, we buy the product and verify the CoA ourselves.
• Honesty about what's missing. If a vendor's CoA lacks mass spectrometry confirmation, we say so. If a compound has zero human clinical trials, we lead with that.
• Research framing, always. The compounds we cover are research chemicals. We don't tell anyone to inject anything. We report what the literature shows and let you make informed decisions.
• No pay-for-praise. Affiliate partnerships never buy a positive review. A vendor either meets the documentation bar or it doesn't.

How we're funded

The Peptide Vault is supported by affiliate commissions. When you buy through some of our links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. That funding keeps the lights on — it does not decide our verdicts. We explain exactly how this works on our affiliate disclosure page.

Contact

Questions, corrections, or a vendor you want us to evaluate? Reach us at hello@thepeptidevault.org. We take accuracy seriously — if we get something wrong, tell us and we'll fix it.